Coke: The Meaning Behind the Song

Oh, the outrage over a Coca-cola commercial!

It’s almost deafening. And yet with everything being said, it becomes more obvious how a political agenda can totally blind you to truth and prevent you from seeing even the most basic point.

In 1971, Coke released a commercial that changed the face of television advertising. It was candlelight. A light shared, one by one it spread, from one race to another, as the children of the world sang “I’d like to teach the world to sing.” The camera panned out to reveal this multicultural group actually formed a human Christmas Tree, the symbol of hope and joy. That was the song they sang: a hope for a home furnished with love, the joy of a world living in harmony. It was a song of peace that echoed in the voices of a people standing hand in hand.

To this day people remember that commercial. They remember the song and the chill that raced down their spine at such a beautiful sentiment. This melting pot we called America, a people of immigrants from every nation of the world, brought together through a common vision and a common dream, understood it wasn’t about race, color or creed. It wasn’t about religion or politics…or even language. It was about peace.

Last Sunday Coca-cola released a follow-up commercial, 43 years later. In this commercial the dream was not only still alive, it had become a reality. In this commercial, the world sang in perfect harmony. They sang in their language, from their history and perspective, from their hopes and dreams, from their home of love.

You see, the dream was never about teaching the world to sing in English. It was never a song of assimilation; it wasn’t even a song of patriotism. It was a love song.

For those who viewed this commercial and understood, a new chill raced down their spines.

I’d like to teach the world to sing…

They did it.

Today the world sang, and the song was America The Beautiful.

Perhaps Coke got it right again. What the world wants today is America the Beautiful, not the America lost in political agendas and self-righteous fighting.

Maybe, just maybe, if we could stop the fighting and listen, we could hear the world singing in perfect harmony: “…And crown thy good with brotherhood from sea to shining sea.

It’s Bastille Day…

Happy Bastille Day!

20120714_185941
Bastille Day Parade in Sanary

July 14th is La Fête Nationale in France. While this is the date of the storming of the Bastille, the holiday is actually to commemorate the Fête de la Fédération. It is a symbol of the uprising of the modern nation and of the reconciliation of all the French inside the constitutional monarchy which preceded the First Republic during the French Revolution.

Last year I celebrated in Sanary, a commune situated east of Marseille in the department of Bouches-du-Rhone in the Provence-Alpes-Cote d’Azur region in southern France.

Street Performer
Street Performer

It’s a charming seaside community and fishing port. This area is famous for beautiful beaches, stunning views and boat tours to the Calanques, an area that features towering cliffs and dramatic inlets. We had taken one of those boat tours earlier in the day, but were now enjoying the festivities on the port.

The streets were lined with festival tents and booths where local craftsmen and artisans sold their wares, while performance artists entertained children and adults alike. We weaved through the crowds, checking out the special menus at the restaurants along the bay, until settling on a small pub near the place we had chosen for our fireworks viewing.

Picturesque Cassis
Picturesque Sanary

As the sun went down in the horizon, the parade of boats began. Sail boats, fishing boats and yachts, decorated with lights and ornaments, circled the harbor as patriotic music resounded through a centralized sound system. The crowds became thick in anticipation of the coming fireworks, but we found a semi-secluded spot on one of the docks.

The original celebration occurred on July 14th, 1790. The popular General Lafayette took his oath to the constitution, followed by King Louis XVI. After the end of this four day feast, people celebrated with wine, fireworks and running naked through the streets in order to display their great freedom.

The Fireworks of Bastille Day, 2012.
The Fireworks of Bastille Day, 2012.

I kept my clothes on, but sat with my legs swinging free over the water and enjoyed a scoop of mango ice cream. The fireworks exploded against the picturesque landscape and festive port, and I was transported back in time to a child mesmerized by lights and sounds, free from worry, heartache and fear, free to be…and that is reason to celebrate.

The Joy Of Juggling: Keeping Your Burdens In The Air

I like to attend local festivals.

Most of the time they are named after an idea or emblem common and representative of the area, such as The Dogwood Festival or The Yellow Daisy Festival.  Sometimes they just echo the theme: The Jazz Festival or The Blues Festival.  Generally they are centered around arts, crafts and music (with a sprinkling of local cuisine thrown into the mix). But occasionally there can be found an aberrant festival, one that steps outside the norm and doesn’t simply host the traditional ideas, but embraces a reclusive, and often bizarre, interest with passion and enthusiasm.   These are the festivals that provide the most fascinating glimpses into the human psyche and segmented sociology.  They are also surprisingly fun!

Today I went to the Jugglers Festival.

There wasn’t much advertising surrounding the event.  I wouldn’t have even known it was being sponsored if I hadn’t heard about it from a friend.  He is a member of the Seed & Feed March Abominable Band.  They are known for their surprise blitzes  Atlanta throughout where they show up in crazy costumes to interrupt every day moments with their song and dance.  They are a kind of marching band flash mob, bringing laughter to the mundane. The band would be opening at the Jugglers Festival at the Shriner’s Temple.

The whole idea is something out of the Twilight Zone.  Imagine my surprise to find hundreds of people packing the place. I could barely find a parking spot!  I couldn’t believe so many people were looking to find interesting ways to keep their balls in the air.

It turns out the festival celebrates the art of juggling.  They offer performances by professionals and competitions for amateurs.  They offer mini-workshops to teach the basics and more advanced for those who want to improve their skills to perhaps catch items on their back and head while balancing on a ball.  Of course, there are tables set up from supply vendors offering balls, pins, swords, specialty gloves and even costumes for jugglers.  It’s quite a structured and enthusiastic event.

As I moved around the room, I noted the crowd was not made up of the strange and unusual.  These were everyday people, in everyday clothes, enjoying an unusual hobby to the point of obsession. What’s more?  They were happy. They weren’t self-conscious or embarrassed; they were just enjoying the moment.  I liked them immediately.

This was certainly a trip through the looking-glass into a realm some would call freaky (you know, the people who lack the balls to live a little and just laugh).  This was a place where people broke with expectations, propriety and “common interests to passionately pursue what they love.  And if you chose to arch a brow or cast a frown, you might just get pulled into the show as a means to break through those walls!  After all, it’s hard to judge when you’re juggling.

Maybe there’s a lesson here.  If we all took the time to pursue something out of the ordinary and embraced it with such fervor, our burdens wouldn’t feel so heavy with so much joy in the air.

House MD, Twenty Vicodin: Episode 8×01

Tonight, Monday, October 3rd marks the House MD season 8 premiere.
Twenty Vicodin
Written by Peter Blake; Directed by Greg Yaitanes
 
When last we saw Dr. Gregory House (Hugh Laurie), he was smiling in relief after plowing his car into the home of his ex-girlfriend, Dr. Lisa Cuddy (Lisa Edelstein).  Although meant to be a metaphorical ending – representative of breaking the chains of expectations, change, propriety and connection – the controversial finale instead brought a dark and tragic ending to a lack-luster season full of missed opportunities, unbelievable stories and disintegrated characterizations.

The House team has been teasing the fans for years with a Greg House who was progressively uncomfortable with life and misery, and was seeking to change.  Yet even through a mental breakdown, time in a mental institution, detox from vicodin, regaining his medical license, rebuilding his medical practice, entering into an overdue and long-awaited relationship (they spent all of season 6 focused on House pining for Cuddy), experiencing the subsequent break-up, going back on drugs and falling into a debauchery that took the viewers beyond all realm of belief, there was no exploration into the House character or his issues beyond a desire to connect and a need to trust. With so much build-up and promise, the viewers needed to learn more about House and experience a little more emotional substance to support the abundance of shocking twists. The persistent focus on other characters and insignificant plots that did nothing to get inside the heart and soul of this complex character, left viewers increasingly frustrated and angry.  The extremes of season 7, in conjunction with the unmet hopes for deeper emotional insight that should have been brought to the surface in a romantic relationship, proved to create a brand of animosity almost palpable for many viewers.  Critics and fans alike were vocal throughout the season regarding their ever-increasing dissatisfaction. The finale was a blow that left many viewers feeling they simply could not tolerate anymore teasing and stagnancy from a character that had now been reduced to an unsympathetic shell of the anti-hero they’d been rooting for so many years.

The Season 8 premiere, Twenty Vicodin, begins with House in front of the parole board.  In the first minutes, the viewer is subjected to a series of explanations, excuses and justifications for his violent act that are a complete regurgitation of the many interviews from show creator David Shore over the summer.  I’m not certain if they believed the words would be more acceptable coming from the mouth of Hugh Laurie or the character of House, but it certainly continued to downplay the magnitude of the violence, attempted to ignore the significance of the act as more than just inappropriate and careless, and minimized the greater emotional and psychological trauma such an act causes for both the victim and the one-time aggressor (as they make it a point to stress). Nevertheless, as a result of overcrowding, House has the opportunity to make parole if he can behave himself for 5 days.

The episode is slow.  It spends time establishing the various politics and power structures within the prison.  The viewers are made aware through a series of scenes that House has learned to navigate the various sects and manipulate the system.  He is more subdued than we’ve seen him since the first few episodes of the series.  He is restrained, yet still smart mouthed, and continues to push the line of propriety even as he follows the rules set out before him by both guards and alpha prisoners. Unfortunately, the possibility of parole has now shifted the lines of power and new expectations are placed upon House.  This, intermixed with the medical puzzle presented through a fellow prisoner, pushes House into situations and old behaviors that could risk his parole, and even his future both in and out of prison.

The patient of the week has a rash.  Not interesting to Dr. House, but a trip to the infirmary during his daily janitorial chores – which of course leads to the introduction of new doctor, Dr. Adams (Odette Annabel) – draws House into a new puzzle. The patient of the week is interesting, even though the changing power dynamic with the inmates prove to distract from the case.  As usual, there are several misdiagnosis and treatments before the final epiphany, but it allows more time to set some groundwork for the season.

Typical of House, he reads Dr. Adams almost immediately and uses his knowledge to manipulate his way into further involvement with the case.  We understand immediately that House sees in the prison doctor an altruistic nature that frustrates as much as fascinates, but he’s most intrigued by her interest in the medical puzzle.  This commonality would have felt like a good foundation for a future connection had it not been for the forced and cliché scene wherein House and Dr. Adams mirror one another in a reaction to the patient’s symptoms.  As Adams declares “cool” when the patient bleeds profusely, the relationship suddenly felt forced, weakening any natural chemistry between the two.

The new doctor does however provide an outlet to introduce what will very likely be an important push this season.  House has a gift.  Yes, the gift of medicine, but this is not the one in the spotlight.  He has a gift of reading people.  This is not a new revelation into the House character; we’ve known about this gift all along.  It is the aspect of House that made season 7 so unbelievable and frustrating.  It is the aspect that viewers were expected to ignore as it undermined the unconvincing weakness in the structure of the House/Cuddy romantic relationship, challenged the notion that he is incapable of sustaining a relationship and made incoherent the notion that he could not function in his medical prowess while in a relationship.

Additionally, House is driven by a need to be right, which both supports and disrupts that gift.  His interchanges with Dr. Adams regarding these aspects of his personality are very reminiscent of the season 3 episode, Son of a Coma Guy. In fact, I found the echoes of the Baraku back-story quite beautiful.  Unfortunately, having writer Peter Blake admit to an online Twitter follower that this homage was unintentional and an accidental connection was a bit disheartening.  Most House fans are smart and analytical, making the connections that reflect the complexity of the character.  To think these connections are more accidental than intentional really makes you appreciate how much power is packed into a real plan.  Such an admission leaves viewers appreciative that accidents like this happen, but doesn’t build faith in the talent and forethought of the writers.

Predictably, House does not submit to the demands of the prisoners.  He throws the expectations in their faces, placing himself in future risk by disrupting and confronting the power structure, and he destroys this chance for parole.  The new doctor sides with House and breaks the rules for the “good of the patient.”  For a moment, House and the viewers are left wondering if all of his scheming was worth it.  But then, in the final scenes we’re reminded that House is always right, and that yes – it’s what he most needs to hear.

This isn’t one of their strongest episodes. It felt laborious and did not utilize the characters for emotional and/or intellectual impact.  Jaleel White and Michael Pare were no more than bit characters, wasting considerable talent and possibilities.  The scenes with Kaleti Williams offered the most interesting material of the episode, with few spoken words and a lot of expression, their scenes created the ambiguity and complexity into character motivations that House fans love. The secondary patient for House, found in his cellmate’s pet cricket, provided more depth than the primary story.

It was disappointing to have Dr. Adams, who will later become a permanent member of the diagnostic team, placed in the precarious position of mocking the fans/critics through a bit of dialogue that both minimized violence and ignored the overall impact. Scripting her to address this ill-conceived notion marred her character and placed the actress in even a more difficult position in her journey to win over the audience in the post-Cuddy era.

For that matter, the episode didn’t address an important and anticipated detail since it was announced that Lisa Edelstein would not be returning to the show:  the absence of Lisa Cuddy. In the overall structure of the episode, it makes sense that she’s not mentioned.  On the other hand, some viewers are watching the premiere for the singular purpose of seeing how they will write-off this valued member of the team.  The fact that they do not reveal any real pain or remorse regarding his relationship with Cuddy or the violent act “on her home,” may prove to be an albatross around the proverbial neck of this series.  Even in a moment when the viewer is clearly meant to sympathize with House as he bemoans lost love through the “reading” of his patient, there is a lack of emotional authenticity.  He may not have anyone waiting for him and everyone has moved on during his months of imprisonment, but without the depth of sorrow and longing (such as seen throughout S6 as he pined for Cuddy), it’s hard to garner any sympathy or regain the connection to the character.

Additionally, the overuse of vocal epiphanies into House and his motives (through Dr. Adams) are unconvincing.  Where the show once allowed the subtle nuances that Hugh Laurie brought to his performance, and House himself to actually unveil the character (while still leaving much up to varied interpretations) it has become a disappointing habit over the past few seasons to have the unlikely characters in his life allegedly “explain” him.  This is demeaning to a smart audience, and still doesn’t really give away anything about the character because the viewers cannot really believe what is being said.  With anvil approaches, there is always doubt, disbelief and disappointment.

For a series that needed to come on strong in what may be their final season, it is in fact weak.  They are facing an already difficult task with the loss of Lisa Edelstein, who portrayed a very popular character and an integral part in the story, but the rebuilding of the primary character of House is the most challenging goal of all. After the controversy of last season’s finale, they needed to not only address the punishment for House’s crime against Cuddy, but also surprise the audience with a revelation of his character that would give some meaning to the debacle of season 7. The ambiguity that is usually a hallmark of the series only proves to weaken this premiere that so desperately needed to take a strong, intentional stand on both issues and direction.  Even the reason for his sentence is ambiguous, as the viewer is left wondering if House threw himself on the sword as a means to punish himself for the acts that brought him shame, or did his arrogance place him in jail?

The somber tones of the episodes and the insights into Dr. Gregory House (which at this point are new to the characters, not the viewer) are reminiscent of the pilot, and it often feels like that is exactly what this is – a pilot episode for the new House MD.  The main character is interesting, but the peripheral characters are uninspired.  The setting is overplayed and cliché, even though there was much less prison violence than the promos suggested.   Hugh Laurie is talented and imparts more into the story than the script projects.  The subtle focus on House’s gift and his incessant need to be right is as intriguing now as it was the first time.  Unfortunately, the failure to open House up to any new revelations regarding his issues, or even touch on one of the many dropped plots throughout the series, continues to be problematic for the overall narrative.  The House character is the show; he’s the purpose and the focal point. But failing to delve deeper into the character’s past and his nature erodes the very foundation of this series.  The introduction of new characters, peripheral subplots and shock/awe story twists are not sustainable without the fortification of a growing understanding into the heart and soul of Dr.Gregory House.

Although this premiere offers a reset and a possibility to “return to roots” as David Shore suggests, it’s just another crash for House where he is placed in a new situation, with new people, new challenges, and is taken to yet another dark place, but without growth or substance.  The character remains stagnant with only the performance Hugh Laurie providing depth.  It doesn’t make you want to change the channel, but it certainly makes you hope episode 2 will bring something to get House off the hamster wheel, and re-ignite our love of the show and the character.

Rating: C